Skip to content
VerdictCONSULTING GROUP
Payer v. providerSettled

United Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Radiology Partners, Inc.

D. Ariz. · Updated

Summary

UnitedHealthcare alleged that Radiology Partners knowingly submitted ineligible claims to the federal IDR process to obtain excessive awards. After the court granted the defendants' motion to strike on September 16, 2026, the parties filed a joint notice of settlement on October 1, 2026. The court ordered the case dismissed with prejudice within 45 days unless a stipulation is filed first.

Timeline of rulings

  1. D. Ariz.

    Court advised of settlement; case to be dismissed with prejudice within 45 days absent a stipulation, pending motions denied as moot.

    Read the ruling
  2. D. Ariz.

    Defendants' motion to strike granted.

    Read the ruling

Why it matters

It is one of the few payer suits over IDR conduct to end in settlement rather than a dismissal ruling, so it produced no decision on the merits of the payer's theory.

Sources

  1. United Healthcare Services v. Radiology Partners, Order (D. Ariz. Oct. 2, 2026)
  2. United Healthcare Services v. Radiology Partners, Complaint (D. Ariz. Aug. 8, 2025)
  3. O'Neill Institute tracker — UnitedHealthcare v. Radiology Partners

General information only, not legal advice. Verdict Consulting Group is not a law firm.